The case where the Court held that due process requires that a U.S.citizen who is detained for allegedly fighting against the United States as an enemy combatant should be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for his detention before a neutral decision maker is

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court held that a U.S. citizen who is detained for allegedly fighting against the United States as an enemy combatant should be given a meaningful opportunity to contest the factual basis for his detention before a neutral decision maker. This decision upheld the principle of due process and ensured that U.S. citizens have the right to challenge their detention in court. The other options are incorrect as they involve different cases or do not address the same issue of due process for U.S. citizens detained as enemy combatants.

The Case Where the Court Held That Due Process Requires