In U.S.v.Dickerson (1999) ,the U.S.Court of Appeals held that the requirement of Miranda warnings was overruled by a federal statute because Miranda was
A) a judge-made rule that can be overridden by Congress.
B) an unconstitutional decision by the U.S.Supreme Court.
C) a constitutional command that can be overridden by Congress.
D) created by Congress and therefore subject to elimination by Congress.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q29: The Miranda warnings must be given when
Q30: According to the Miranda rule,evidence obtained by
Q31: Miranda v.Arizona is based on protections guaranteed
Q32: Before Miranda,the sole test for the admissibility
Q33: In which of the following situations are
Q35: In which of the following ways are
Q36: The rule that provides that harmless errors
Q37: For trial court judges,the importance of Miranda
Q38: Which of the following is NOT a
Q39: The fact that Miranda tells the police
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents