A suspect is involved in an automobile accident and is properly arrested for drunk driving.The police take the suspect to a hospital and a doctor draws a blood sample without the suspect's consent or a warrant.Blood alcohol content evidence is admitted against the defendant at trial.What did the U.S.Supreme Court decide in Schmerber v.California (1966) ,about the admissibility of this procedure?
A) This procedure did not violate the Fourth Amendment.
B) This procedure did violate the Fourth Amendment
C) This procedure did not violate the Fifth Amendment.
D) This procedure did violate the Fifth Amendment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: Failure to provide a lawyer at a
Q26: The rule that a defendant is not
Q27: Which of the following procedures is NOT
Q28: Which of the following is a means
Q29: Which of the following procedures would violate
Q31: Which of the following is typical of
Q32: Photographic identification does not involve any unreasonable
Q33: Which of the following is NOT a
Q34: The Eyewitness Identification Guidelines from the U.S.Department
Q35: Given current skepticism about the reliability of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents