Hill (2000) ,following Kant,argues that use of force in self-defense against opposing force ______.
A) shows a lack of human respect for the attacker
B) is a selfish,immoral act
C) violates Kant's second categorical imperative
D) is moral,and a right and responsibility
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q26: As an example of Kant's second categorical
Q27: Kant assumed that immoral/unethical acts were always
Q28: In Kant's view,human beings have a/an _
Q29: If to follow a proposed categorical imperative
Q30: Kant assumed that,at least in general,human beings
Q32: One form of Kant's categorical imperative is
Q33: Kant argued that the _ is an
Q34: Kant argues that the categorical imperative binds
Q35: One should never lie because if lying
Q36: According to Kant,we should not allow our
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents