The Sampson Hair Products company is sued by a user who contracted a painful rash from using its shampoo.If Sampson manufactured the product in the same way and to the same standard as a reasonable shampoo manufacturer,and the rash was simply the result of an unusual allergy,Sampson will not be held liable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

If Sampson followed industry standard manufacturing practices and the rash was caused by an unusual allergy, then they cannot be held liable for the user's reaction. This is because manufacturers cannot be expected to anticipate every possible allergic reaction, as long as they followed standard protocols for creating the product.

The Sampson Hair Products Company Is Sued by a User