"Beauty" in Astronomy: In the absence of observational evidence, scientists often rely on other considerations to make decisions. One such consideration that we have met before (Chapter 3)is Occam's razor: the simplest explanation is to be preferred. Another consideration that is often used (and sometimes championed)by astronomers is the perceived "beauty" of the ideas themselves. Imagine you lived at a time before observational tests could be brought to bear on which of the ultimate fates (re- collapsing, critical, coasting, or accelerating)applies to our universe. Which fate would you support based on your own personal idea of "beauty"? Give your arguments, even if you think they are not scientific. Did you choose the observationally supported theory? What do you think of the role such considerations play in science? Are they sometimes necessary?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q39: GUT theories predict that protons will eventually
Q59: If the universe is accelerating,it will expand
Q75: Explain how observations of white-dwarf supernovae provide
Q104: The visible parts of galaxies contribute about
Q105: Recent measurements of temperature fluctuations in the
Q107: If we were to learn that the
Q108: How do we know that there can
Q110: Dark matter particles were definitively detected in
Q113: Dark matter in galaxies and clusters of
Q114: Briefly describe the four possible expansion patterns
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents