With regard to recovered memories, on which point are nonscientific writers and research psychologists most likely to agree?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Both nonscientific writers and research psychologists are likely to agree that recovered memories, in the absence of other evidence, are not sufficient to prove past abuse. This is a point of consensus among experts in the field of psychology, who caution against relying solely on recovered memories as evidence of abuse due to the potential for distortion or fabrication of memories.

With Regard to Recovered Memories, on Which Point Are Nonscientific