Recall that Perrett et al. (1994) created two kinds of composite faces, an "average attractive" composite and a "highly attractive" composite, using photographs of Caucasian and Japanese men and women. They then asked participants in Great Britain and Japan to rate these faces. Which of the following was NOT a finding of their study?
A) The highly attractive composites were rated as significantly more attractive than the average attractive composites.
B) Japanese and British participants differed in their assessments, with people preferring faces from their own ethnicity.
C) The highly attractive faces were more extreme in the features that are generally considered attractive (e.g., if high cheekbones in general are attractive, then highly attractive faces have higher cheekbones) .
D) The features that were considered attractive were similar to the features found to be attractive by other researchers.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q48: Recall that Elaine Hatfield (Walster) and her
Q49: Research suggests that there is _ between
Q50: Researchers (Sergios & Cody, 1985) conducted a
Q51: There is mounting evidence suggesting that people
Q52: Sheila is considered to be very attractive
Q54: Research has found that there is agreement
Q55: Feingold (1990) conducted a meta-analysis of a
Q56: Evolutionarily speaking, one reason that people prefer
Q57: Feingold (1990) conducted a meta-analysis of a
Q58: In studies on what people find attractive,
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents