Recall that even when participants in an experiment conducted by Jones and Harris (1967) were told that people were assigned to write an essay sympathetic to Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, they still were willing to assume that the essay reflected the writer's true "pro-Castro" attitudes. In this experiment, how could people have avoided the fundamental attribution error?
A) They could have assumed that the essay writer's attitude was pro-Castro, and as extreme as that of the essay he or she wrote.
B) They could have assumed that the essay writer's attitude was pro-Castro, but probably less extreme than the essay he or she wrote.
C) They could have assumed that the essay writer's attitude was anti-Castro.
D) They could have assumed nothing, and rated the essay writer's attitude at the midpoint of the pro- and anti-Castro scale.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q105: One assumption of the covariation model is
Q106: Heider assumed that people generally preferred internal
Q107: According to the text, we often fall
Q108: When people make the fundamental attribution error,
Q109: Samuel, a fifth grader, had to write
Q111: When people make attributions, research has suggested,
Q112: During spring term of her senior year,
Q113: When people do not have the information
Q114: The fundamental attribution error is also known
Q115: When a person makes the fundamental attribution
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents