The Calabresi and Melamed principles do not inquire which party is best positioned to induce others to take actions that will improve the difference between social benefits and social costs.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Calabresi and Melamed framework, as outlined in their seminal article "Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral," indeed considers which party (the injurer or the victim) is best positioned to induce actions that will minimize the difference between social costs and social benefits, thereby enhancing overall social welfare. This is a fundamental aspect of their analysis on how rights should be protected or allocated to achieve efficient outcomes.

The Calabresi and Melamed Principles Do Not Inquire Which Party