The best statement of the test applied in determining if a defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries is:
A) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that the defendant would engage in this conduct?
B) Given this particular injury to the plaintiff,was it foreseeable that the defendant was the cause?
C) Should it have been foreseeable to the defendant that the defendant's conduct could lead to this kind of injury?
D) Was the injury foreseeable to the plaintiff prior to the injury's occurrence?
E) Was it foreseeable to the plaintiff that this kind of injury could occur under the particular conditions that the injury did occur?
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q31: Which of the following is true about
Q32: The tort of assault differs from the
Q33: The doctrine applied when someone intends to
Q34: How is false imprisonment defined?
A) being held
Q35: Which of the following is true about
Q37: Assuming that statutory requirements are met,what is
Q38: Which of the following is true?
A) Slander
Q39: A medical doctor who commits medical malpractice
Q40: A medical doctor who amputates the wrong
Q41: Product disparagement differs from defamation of a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents