Roger intentionally set his residence on fire in order to collect insurance proceeds.While the fire was being fought,the police arrived to help with the crowds of onlookers.Roger realized he had done something wrong and went to one of the police officers and told the officer that he had started the fire intentionally.The police officer did not give Roger the Miranda warnings.What is the most likely outcome if Roger tries to have the confession excluded from evidence at trial?
A) Because the Miranda warnings were not given,the confession must be excluded.
B) Because Roger was not in custody,was not a suspect,and was not being questioned about the fire,the Miranda warnings did not need to be given and the confession may be admitted as evidence.
C) Because the police did not have an arrest warrant,the confession cannot be admitted because the Miranda warnings were not given.
D) Because the Fifth Amendment requires exclusion of any incriminating evidence,the confession cannot be used.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q58: Which is true about jury verdicts in
Q59: If a defendant does not admit guilt,but
Q60: Identity fraud typically occurs when:
A) someone uses
Q62: To prove a pattern of racketeering under
Q64: Dean and Mary agree to sell fake
Q65: A Rocky Mountain state has extensive safety
Q66: The Sixth Amendment right to a public
Q67: A legitimate business that shows fake expenditures
Q68: Which of the following statements is true?
A)
Q148: Mary was at a party given by
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents