How does a "no-arrival,no-sale" contract differ from an F.O.B.destination contract?
A) If the goods fail to reach their destination,the seller must replace them in an F.O.B. destination contract,but not in a no-arrival,no-sale contract.
B) Risk of loss while the goods are in transit is on the seller in an F.O.B. destination contract,but on the buyer in a no-arrival,no-sale contract.
C) Implied warranties exist in the F.O.B. destination contract,but not in the no-arrival,no-sale contract.
D) Identification will occur in an F.O.B. destination contract,but not in a no-arrival,no-sale contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q49: If no carrier is involved,the goods are
Q50: When a buyer may return goods to
Q51: Which of the following best describes the
Q52: In which of the following,does the buyer
Q53: Identification of goods is significant because:
A) it
Q55: For which of the following does the
Q56: In a noncarrier case for the sale
Q57: When does risk of loss pass in
Q58: Which of the following is true about
Q59: If a contract calls for the goods
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents