Lisa purchases a home theater system from Homeplace Cinema.Lisa signs a $10,000 negotiable promissory note in connection with this purchase.This note requires monthly payments for 5 years.After the system is installed,Lisa begins to have trouble with it.It turns out that there are defective components in both the video and audio aspects of the system.Meanwhile,Homeplace Cinema has sold Lisa's promissory note to Amalgamated Finance,which meets all the requirements of a holder in due course.Lisa refuses to make any further payments on the notes due to the breach of contract by Homeplace Cinema.Which of the following is true?
A) Lisa has no further obligation to pay because the breach of contract is a real defense.
B) Lisa must pay the note to the extent of the fair market value of the home theater system in its current condition.
C) Lisa does not have to pay because federal legislation has eliminated holder in due course protection for negotiable instruments that are part of a consumer credit transaction.
D) Lisa must pay because the obligation of a promissory note is always unconditional.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q62: Marti issues a check payable to the
Q63: Against whom can the maker of a
Q65: An accommodating party that signs an instrument
Q66: Why is fraud in the inducement treated
Q69: Terry has a business in which he
Q70: Carl is the maker of a note
Q71: What is the purpose of the Federal
Q101: Stan Johnson is the secretary of Balzene's,Inc.a
Q109: Martha is elderly,does not speak or read
Q115: What is the consequence of a defense
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents