In January of 2001,Fred had a cocktail party for his coworkers.The next day,after cleaning up,Fred noticed that a check had been stolen from his checkbook.Fred immediately called his bank and issued a stop-payment order on the check.One week later,the check was received by the bank and the bank paid it.Fred's signature was forged on the check.Fred never followed his oral stop-payment order with a written stop payment order.Because Fred was notoriously sloppy with his personal financial affairs,Fred did not notice that the bank had paid the check until he was preparing his income tax return in April of 2002.Can Fred recover from the bank?
A) Yes,because the bank paid the check contrary to a valid stop-payment order.
B) Yes,because the indorsement on the check was forged.
C) No,because he did not execute a written stop-payment order to follow up his oral order.
D) No,because the fact that the check was stolen was not the bank's fault.
E) No,because too much time had passed from when Fred had the information about the bank having paid the check to notify the bank.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q56: When a check is presented for payment
Q57: Which of the following is true of
Q58: Which of the following is a characteristic
Q60: In connection with a checking account at
Q62: Which of the following is true about
Q63: If a party presents a check containing
Q65: Barry writes a check to Larry,but before
Q66: Deferred posting refers to:
A) the ability of
Q84: When a bank has wrongfully dishonored a
Q115: Why does the law generally place the
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents