Which of the following is NOT an argument in favor of the moral imperative of universal insurance coverage?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

This argument actually goes against universal insurance coverage. The argument in favor of universal insurance coverage is that all citizens should have equal access to healthcare regardless of income, and that the government has a moral obligation to ensure a basic minimum of healthcare for all citizens. The argument that national health insurance would drive up the cost of healthcare is a critique of the feasibility or effectiveness of implementing such a policy, not an argument for the moral imperative of insurance coverage.

Which of the Following Is NOT an Argument in Favor