The empirical and theoretical results on occupational crowding in the United States suggest that
A) occupational crowding is substantial in the United States, but this should not be thought of as a source of discrimination.
B) occupational crowding is substantial in the United States, and much of this should be thought of as a source of discrimination.
C) occupational crowding is substantial in the United States, but occupational crowding is unrelated to discrimination.
D) there is minimal occupational crowding in the United States, and therefore it cannot be a source of discrimination.
E) there is minimal occupational crowding in the United States, but this is still thought to be an important cause of racial discrimination but not gender discrimination.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: Which of the following causes a difference
Q21: If one looks at U.S. Census data
Q22: If one looks at U.S. Census data
Q23: Occupational crowding refers to
A) employee-based discrimination.
B) licensure
Q24: There is a debate over how much
Q25: When the labor force participation rate falls,
Q26: Consider a color-blind firm that is currently
Q28: One possible measure of gender discrimination is
Q29: From 1980 to 2012, the female-male wage
Q30: The female-male wage gap in the United
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents