The argument most often used against redistribution is that a society as wealthy as the United States should not have a legal obligation to provide all its members with the basic necessities of life.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument most often used against redistribution is that it can disincentivize work and innovation, not that a wealthy society should not have a legal obligation to provide basic necessities. Critics argue that redistribution can reduce the incentive for individuals to work hard and innovate if they know that a portion of their earnings will be redistributed.

The Argument Most Often Used Against Redistribution Is That a Society