The case of Atlas Supply Co.of Canada v.Yarmouth Equipment (1991) ,103 N.S.R.(2d) 1 (N.S.C.A.) disallowed the reliance on the defendant's exclusion clauses to prevent evidence of the plaintiff's reliance on misleading information provided by the defendant.The dissenting appellant court judge cautioned against setting aside business deals such as this one.What was the dissenting appellant court judge advocating by taking this position?
A) that a small businessperson needs protection from unconscionable big businesses
B) that the acceptance of bad faith misrepresentations is a legal commercial negotiating practice
C) that the acceptance of unconscionable misrepresentations is grounds to set aside a contract
D) that a small businessperson is disadvantaged when dealing with a multinational business
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A sales representative knowingly entered into a
Q2: Which of the following would be enforceable
Q9: Luis believes his contract with ABC Homebuilder's
Q10: In the case of Atlas Supply Co
Q10: Cory,aged 17,plays hockey under contract with the
Q12: Which of the following statements accurately reflects
Q13: In what way is a void contract
Q14: What are the elements of importance emphasized
Q17: Even though Dalbert knew Rahim had consumed
Q18: Where circumstances surrounding a proposed commercial transaction
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents