In the case of SNS Industrial Products Limited v.Bank of Montreal,2010 ONCA 500,the Ontario Court of Appeal the bank failed to detect a forged signature on cheques drawn on a client's account,with the result that $186 488 was fraudulently taken from its customer's account over a three year period.Who was responsible for detecting the forgeries,the customer or the bank,and why?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In the case of SNS Industrial Products Limited v.Bank of Montreal,2010 ONCA 500,the Ontario Court of Appeal the bank failed to detect a forged signature on cheques drawn on a client's account,with the result that $186 488 was fraudulently taken from its customer's account over a three year period.Who was responsible for detecting the forgeries,the customer or the bank,and why?

In the Case of SNS Industrial Products Limited V