A Lawyer for a Defendant Is Arguing That the Plaintiff

A lawyer for a defendant is arguing that the plaintiff negligently failed to keep a proper lookout for pucks at a hockey arena,causing his own injury.What classification could likely be applied by a court to negatively influence the viability of this defence?

A) plaintiff as a trespasser on private property
B) flying pucks as a danger clubs ought to anticipate
C) flying pucks as substantial interference with enjoyment of the game
D) trespassers as presenting a substantially unreasonable intrusion