Able Investing is attempting to "poach" a very successful investment consultant from a competing investment firm and offered him $25 000 to break his three-year contract with his employer.What tort action might Able's competitor bring against Able in the event the consultant breaks his contract?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Interference with contractual relations is the correct tort action in this scenario because Able Investing is intentionally trying to disrupt the existing contract between the consultant and his current employer by offering an incentive to break that contract.

Able Investing Is Attempting to "Poach" a Very Successful Investment