We can conclude from the table shown that Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of tables.
$$\begin{array}{l}
\quad\quad\text { Labar Input to Praduce Chairs and Tables }\
\begin{array} { | l | c | c | }
\hline \quad\quad& \text { Marncen }\quad\quad\quad\quad & \text { Spain }\quad\quad\quad\quad \
\hline \text { Chair } & 3 & 1 \
\hline \text { Table } & 10 & 5 \
\hline
\end{array}
\end{array}$$

Question

We can conclude from the table shown that Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of tables.
 $$\begin{array}{l}
\quad\quad\text { Labar Input to Praduce Chairs and Tables }\
\begin{array} { | l | c | c | } 
\hline \quad\quad& \text { Marncen }\quad\quad\quad\quad & \text { Spain }\quad\quad\quad\quad \
\hline \text { Chair } & 3 & 1 \
\hline \text { Table } & 10 & 5 \
\hline
\end{array}
\end{array}$$

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Spain has a comparative advantage in the production of chairs, not tables, because it requires fewer labor hours to produce a chair compared to Moracen. Comparative advantage is determined by the opportunity cost of producing goods, and in this case, Spain uses labor more efficiently to produce chairs than tables when compared to Moracen.

We Can Conclude from the Table Shown That Spain Has