In R. V. Milot, the Court Held That

In R. v. Milot, the court held that:

A) the need to protect the child victim from harm outweighed the defendant's right to confront his accuser.
B) the right to confront one's accuser is not seriously reduced by the use of a one-way screen.
C) the truth-finding function of the trial is best served by allowing the use of video-taped pretrial interviews.
D) a 7-year-old is not so young that testifying outside the courtroom is a required accommodation.