In the case of RBC Dominion Securities Inc.v.Merrill Lynch Canada Inc.,2008 SCC 54,the court stated that "the duty does not necessarily extend to preventing parting employees from taking client information...." In this instance,what duty is the Supreme Court referring to?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Supreme Court is referring to the duty of confidentiality. In this context, the court clarified that while employees have a duty of confidentiality towards their employer, this duty does not automatically extend to preventing them from taking client information when they leave the company.

In the Case of RBC Dominion Securities Inc