The injured plaintiff in a car accident lawsuit was not wearing her seatbelt at the time of the accident,resulting in more severe injuries than if she had been wearing her seatbelt.What argument might the defendant make at her trial?
A) The plaintiff consented to the risk.
B) The plaintiff was contributorily negligent.
C) The plaintiff caused the accident.
D) The plaintiff is vicariously liable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q44: There are many different torts,each with its
Q45: The nature of precedent is inherently contemporary,meaning
Q46: The tort of negligence is the most
Q47: The law of torts narrowly restricts the
Q48: A plaintiff can recover 100% of his
Q50: A judge will likely rely on expert
Q51: Intentional torts are harmful acts that are
Q52: When an employer is vicariously liable,the employee
Q53: The primary goal of non-pecuniary damages is
Q54: Generally,supporting expert evidence is required to sustain
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents