Solved

Imagine We Were Trying to Interpret the Results of a 3

Question 3

Multiple Choice

Imagine we were trying to interpret the results of a 3  3 two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. The data analysis contains no information about sphericity. In this situation, which of the following rows from the output should be interpreted?


A) The Greenhouse-Geisser row, as it is better to assume sphericity has been violated.
B) The row labelled 'sphericity assumed', as it is better to assume sphericity has been met.
C) The Bonferroni row, as it is always better to assume sphericity has been violated.
D) The row labelled 'sphericity assumed', as sphericity is not an issue when there are only two independent variables.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents