Consten,a French company,had exclusive rights to import and distribute German Grundig's electronic products into France.One of the competitors started bringing "parallel imports" into France illegally,importing Grundig products bought from a foreign supplier.Which of the following does not represent an action taken by different legal bodies?
A) Consten's complaint was upheld by two French courts.
B) The Paris Court of Appeals suspended the judgment of the French courts.
C) The Paris Court of Appeal's judgment was based on a ruling by the European Commission.
D) The European Commission ruled against Consten on the grounds that territorial protection proved to be damaging to the Common Market.
E) The European Commission ruled that Grundig was in violation of the laws of the Common Market.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q39: What are the differences between a patent,trademark,and
Q40: Explain,giving examples,as to why "jurisdiction" plays an
Q41: A proposed merger between two Swiss-based global
Q42: OPEC is a cartel,a group of separate
Q43: Which of the following would constitute a
Q45: What is the reason behind the formation
Q46: Which of the following is true about
Q47: Which of the following actions were approved
Q48: As part of their alliance relationship,Northwest Airlines
Q49: Which of the following is true about
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents