Roberts issued a negotiable instrument to Blackmar based on a promise by Blackmar to provide Roberts with a complete gym set to be installed in the basement of his (Roberts) house. Roberts had been looking at this set in a catalog provided by Blackmar for several months, thinking that Blackmar was the salesperson for the company whose name appeared in the catalog. Blackmar, however, had no affiliation with the company. Roberts issued a promissory note to Blackmar thinking that he was paying for the gym set. Blackmar instead indorsed the note and passed it on to Upson for the money he owed to Upson. When Upson presented this note to Roberts for payment, Roberts refused to pay claiming fraud. Is Roberts liable to Upson or can he (Roberts) refuse to make good on the promissory note?
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q40: To be a holder in due course,
Q41: Parties to a negotiable instrument who have
Q42: Notice of dishonor must be given by
Q43: How does the Shelter Provision relate to
Q44: A holder who acts honestly and does
Q45: A person has taken an instrument _
Q47: In what capacity is an accommodation party
Q48: What are the three requirements for a
Q49: A person who signs a negotiable instrument
Q50: A(n) _ is a legal reason offered
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents