The Wurzer Corporation entered into a written contract to hire Dixon in an executive position for six years for $200,000 a year. After three years, Dixon asked for a raise of $25,000 per year. Wurzer at first refused, but then agreed because of the pressure placed on him by Dixon. After the sixth year Dixon left his position with the Corporation and Wurzer sued for a return of the extra $25,000 per year for the three remaining years on Dixon's contract. Who should win the case?
A) Dixon, because Wurzer agreed to the raise.
B) Dixon, if the raise was agreed to in writing
C) Wurzer, even though Wurzer agreed to the raise
D) Wurzer, because Dixon had applied pressure to get the raise.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: Consideration can be
A) a benefit to the
Q20: A creditor's promise to accept less than
Q21: A creditor's agreement to accept part payment
Q22: Part payment of a liquidated claim
A) discharges
Q23: Past consideration
A) is synonymous with moral consideration.
B)
Q25: If a person owes several people money,
Q26: Part payment of a debt can cancel
Q27: Refraining from doing something you have a
Q28: When a debtor and a creditor are
Q29: Courts sometimes apply the doctrine of promissory
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents