In order to establish that a person giving advice owed a duty of care, the plaintiff does not have to prove:
A) The advice caused harm to the person or property of the plaintiff.
B) The advice was of a business or serious nature.
C) The person giving advice knew or should have known that the plaintiff intended to rely on the advice.
D) It was reasonable in the circumstances for the plaintiff to rely on the advice.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: The law of negligence is now a
Q23: A defendant will only owe the plaintiff
Q24: The Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld) states
Q25: At common law, the defendant is said
Q26: An 'occupier' of premises is the person
Q28: A careless act by a person that
Q30: Contributory negligence:
A)Will result in the plaintiff being
Q31: In an action for negligence, if contributory
Q32: In establishing negligence, even if the defendant
Q33: An occupier of premises is only liable
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents