To establish the defence of 'absolute privilege' to the tort of defamation, the defendant must prove:
A) The statement was not motivated by malice and the defendant had a duty to make the statement to a person who had a corresponding duty to receive it.
B) The statement was made during parliament or judicial proceedings.
C) The defamatory statement had one or more other meanings that were substantially true and the defamatory meaning did not harm the reputation of the plaintiff because of the substantial truth of the other meanings.
D) The defamatory statement was substantially true.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q41: Which of the following statements concerning the
Q50: Which of the following is least likely
Q52: Which of the following scenarios would not
Q53: Which of the following is a description
Q55: To establish the defence of 'contextual truth'
Q58: A manufacturer of a defective product is
Q61: The tort of trespass is 'actionable per
Q62: The tort of assault is:
A)Direct and intentional
Q63: The tort of passing off is not
Q64: With Ash's permission, Rachel borrows Ash's car
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents