In a 1997 case, the Supreme Court ruled that the use of public school teachers to teach congressionally mandated remedial courses to disadvantaged students in New York parochial schools was constitutional. Compare the court's reasoning there with its reasoning in Lemon v. Kurtzman, and explain what the difference seems to be.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In a 1997 case, the Supreme Court ruled that the use of public school teachers to teach congressionally mandated remedial courses to disadvantaged students in New York parochial schools was constitutional. Compare the court's reasoning there with its reasoning in Lemon v. Kurtzman, and explain what the difference seems to be.

In a 1997 Case, the Supreme Court Ruled That the Use