In Schmerber v. California, a case involving the compelled extraction of blood from a drunk driving suspect, the U.S. Supreme Court:
I. found that compulsion that makes a suspect the source of physical evidence does not violate the Fifth Amendment.
II. found that such compelled extractions do not violate the due process clause.
III. found the 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination only protects someone from being compelled to give evidence of a testimonial nature.
IV. found that the Fifth Amendment privilege is fulfilled when a person is guaranteed the right to be silent unless he chooses to speak of his own free will.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of In Schmerber v. California, a case involving the compelled extraction of blood from a drunk driving suspect, the U.S. Supreme Court:
I. found that compulsion that makes a suspect the source of physical evidence does not violate the Fifth Amendment.
II. found that such compelled extractions do not violate the due process clause.
III. found the 5th Amendment privilege against self-incrimination only protects someone from being compelled to give evidence of a testimonial nature.
IV. found that the Fifth Amendment privilege is fulfilled when a person is guaranteed the right to be silent unless he chooses to speak of his own free will.

In Schmerber V