In Samson v. California (2006) , the Supreme Court ruled that:
A) a police officer is prohibited from conducting a suspicionless search of a
Parolee.
B) a police officer is not prohibited from conducting a suspicionless search of a
Parolee.
C) a police officer can conduct a suspicionless search of a parolee if the parolee is
Searched in a public place.
D) a police officer must have reasonable suspicion in order to search a parolee.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: Historically,before the second half of the Twentieth
Q20: With regard to the factual foundation required
Q21: According to State v. Ellis, searches of
Q25: The Supreme Court has ruled that inventory
Q25: In National Treasury Employees Union v. Raab,
Q25: The need to protect police from possible
Q26: DNA testing of incarcerated felons:
A) has been
Q27: Concerning student searches conducted by public school
Q29: In National Treasury Employees Union v. Von
Q32: The right against unreasonable searches and seizures
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents