According to the Supreme Court in Chimel v.California,involving the search of a house incident to an arrest for burglary of a coin shop:
A) it is not reasonable to search a person who is lawfully arrested.
B) it is not reasonable to search an entire house incident to a lawful arrest of someone there.
C) the Fourth Amendment does not protect searches incident to lawful arrests.
D) police must always have search warrants to search persons.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: In Wilson v.Arkansas,the Supreme Court unanimously decided
Q11: The reasonableness of searches pursuant to search
Q12: Which of the following government interests are
Q13: Which of the following is NOT an
Q14: In order to conduct a consent search
Q16: According to the Supreme Court in New
Q17: Under the holding in Chimel v.California (1969),a
Q18: Concerning pretext searches:
A)the Supreme Court has decided
Q19: The following are all examples of emergency
Q20: The countervailing law enforcement interests against "noknock"
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents