According to the Supreme Court opinion in Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, involving a search of a car obtained by consent:
I. the question of whether consent was voluntary is a question of fact to be determined by the totality of all the circumstances.
II. the government need not prove that citizens know they have a right to refuse consent.
III. probable cause is required to conduct consent searches.
IV. consent searches can only be conducted if it is inconvenient to get a warrant.
A) I, II, III, IV
B) I, II, IV
C) I, II
D) III, IV
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Police officers at the scene of a
Q26: Concerning third party consent to search, in
Q26: The Fourth Amendment does not prohibit all
Q27: The vehicle exception to the warrant requirement
Q29: Which of the following items may be
Q30: A search warrant must specifically identify "the
Q30: In Wyoming v. Houghton, concerning the search
Q32: Who among the following can give consent
Q33: Regarding consent searches:
I. they require probable cause.
II.
Q40: The scope of a search incident to
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents