In Brigham City Utah V

In Brigham City Utah v.Charles Stuart and Others (2006) ,involving police entering a home without a warrant where teenagers were partying,drinking,and officers observed an altercation occurring inside the home,the Supreme Court ruled that:

A) the officers' entry of the home without a warrant violated the Fourth Amendment.
B) the officers had a right to enter without a warrant because they feared the teens would flee from the house if they waited.
C) the officers had the right to enter without a warrant because they had an objectively reasonable basis for believing someone in the home was seriously injured or being threatened with imminent injury.
D) the officers should have called an ambulance and let the EMTs enter without a warrant.