In California V

In California v. Ciraolo (1986) , a case involving the police using a plane to fly 1000 feet over Ciraolo's yard to see if he was growing marijuana, the Supreme Court ruled:

A) the plane enhanced the police officer's natural vision and, therefore, the Fourth Amendment was implicated and the officers should be held to the probable cause and warrant requirements.
B) the plane enhanced the officer's vision but they had probable cause based on other evidence.
C) the plane didn't enhance the officer's vision, therefore it was a plain view search outside the purvey of the Fourth Amendment.
D) the Fourth Amendment restricts officers from using airplanes to search for drugs.