What distinguishes the following two historical examples of ethically "challenged" incidents: the Willowbrook case and the MK-ULTRA case?
A) Willowbrook broke confidentiality; MK-ULTRA was a failure to debrief
B) the Willowbrook researchers hoped to improve health; the MK-ULTRA researchers were not concerned with medical benefit to society
C) Willowbrook failed on the issue of assent, but was adequate on the issue of consent; the opposite was true of MK-ULTRA
D) Willowbrook involved human participants, while MK-ULTRA used animals
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: What did the Willowbrook and Tuskegee studies
Q23: Which of the following is true of
Q24: A study that involves naturalistic observation of
Q25: Consent forms typically include
A)a brief survey eliciting
Q26: In a study testing prisoners, special care
Q28: At a university or college, the Institutional
Q29: Research participants can expect to find several
Q30: In debriefing after helping behavior studies, experimenters
Q31: Which of the following is true about
Q32: According to the APA's ethics code for
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents