Leilani purchased a business from Troy. She is now interested in the possibility of taking legal action on the basis of an alleged misrepresentation that occurred during the negotiations leading up to the contract. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) because the purpose of rescission is to reverse the effects of a transaction, Leilani will not be able to receive court costs if she rescinds the agreement
B) because the courts will not punish a person who did not breach an obligation, rescission is not available if Troy merely made an innocent misrepresentation
C) The contract can be rescinded only if Troy made a fraudulent misrepresentation.
D) If Troy made a negligent misrepresentation, Leilani may choose to sue in tort rather than rescind the contract.
E) Leilani cannot get rescission because she can only sue in tort.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q35: The possible consequences of actionable misrepresentation include
A)
Q36: An ambiguous contractual term
A) never results in
Q37: Reeni was interested in purchasing a car.
Q38: Suppose that a term is not the
Q39: Which of the following is NOT an
Q42: Parol evidence cannot be used to resolve
Q43: A misstatement of law is identical to
Q44: Restitution is always possible.
Q45: Pre- contractual representations can result in an
Q63: Why are boilerplate provisions of potential value
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents