Preetpal purchased a ticket to ride on a train from Toronto to Ottawa. After she had boarded the train, she was asked if she wished to place her outerwear and backpack into a storage unit on the train. Because she did not want to be encumbered during her journey, she accepted the offer. She was given a "small baggage claims" ticket before handing over her coat and belongings. When the train arrived in Ottawa, and Preetpal tried to collect her coat, she was told that it could not be found. When she threatened to sue, the person who was representing the train told Preetpal that the back of the "small baggage claims" ticket she received excluded liability for lost or stolen goods. Regardless of any other facts, Preetpal can be bound by the exclusion clause only if
A) it was explained to her when she first bought her train ticket.
B) she actually read it.
C) was written in a font that was larger than the font that otherwise appeared on the ticket.
D) the clause was written in a language that she can read.
E) none of the above.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Molly decides to sell her house by
Q19: Diamond Dave decides to sell his donut
Q20: Which of the following statements is FALSE?
Q21: Standard form agreements
A) are rarely offered on
Q22: Consumer protection laws in several jurisdiction including
Q24: A misrepresentation is
A) a kind of mistake.
B)
Q25: The BEST way for a company to
Q26: When will silence distort a previous assertion?
A)
Q27: Justice Howe, a member of the Supreme
Q28: Which of the following approaches to contractual
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents