Laetitia agreed to provide certain services to Hans in exchange for a payment of $10 000. Although Laetitia fully performed her side of the agreement, Hans refuses to pay anything. He insists that Laetitia does not have a right to sue for breach of contract because, in performing the services, she was merely doing something that she had become obliged to do even before she entered into her agreement with Hans. Hans' position is correct if Laetitia's pre- existing obligation was
A) some type of public duty.
B) for some reason enforceable.
C) a private obligation owed to a third party.
D) supported by a seal, rather than by consideration.
E) for some reason unenforceable.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q10: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)
Q11: Which of the following propositions is TRUE
Q12: Sentinel Safety Inc entered into a contract
Q13: The contractual rule that requires an exchange
Q14: Sid and Nancy entered into a contract.
Q16: Fred owed a debt of $10 000
Q17: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)
Q18: Rande promised to provide a series of
Q19: Sarah was an orphan. Her uncle Rocco
Q20: Mohana promised Ian that she would pay
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents