Cookie entered into a contract with Muhammad. Muhammad was required to pay $25 000 to Cookie, and he was entitled to have an engine modified and installed in his speedboat. Jane vicariously performed part of the contract. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) If Jane performed carelessly and caused some sort of loss to the party on the other side of the contract, then the party who suffered the loss must sue Jane rather than the other person who actually signed the contract.
B) Jane almost certainly vicariously performed on behalf of Cookie.
C) Vicarious performance occurs only under an assignment.
D) Vicarious performance will be recognized by a court of equity, but not by a court of law.
E) One of the parties undoubtedly breached the contract.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: Which of the following rules applies to
Q24: The decision in London Drugs Ltd v
Q25: Dunlop sold tires to Mew. The parties'
Q26: Lewis is a wealthy entertainer. While watching
Q27: The traditional doctrine of estoppel, rather than
Q29: Gabriel entered into a contract with Paradise
Q30: Patricia and Charlie entered into a written
Q31: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)
Q32: JB Inc sold a piece of equipment
Q33: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents