Garfield owns and operates a wholesale business called the Overseas Sporting Goods Store (OSGS) . He recently delivered a box of cricket balls to his twenty- year- old son, Imran, and a box of cricket outfits to another sporting goods store called Hit- for- Six. Because Garfield's store went into financial difficulties shortly after making those deliveries to Imran and Hit- for- Six, questions have arisen regarding the nature of those deliveries. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) As a matter of law, the transaction with Hit- for- Six could not be an enforceable contract unless it was sufficiently evidenced in writing.
B) Depending upon the facts, a court might be persuaded that the delivery to Hit- for- Six was not made with an intention to create legal relations.
C) Even if it did not request the outfits, and even though it has not had any communication with Garfield, OSGS will be required to pay for the outfits unless it immediately sends them back to Garfield.
D) As a matter of law, Garfield could not have had an intention to create legal relations when he entered into the transaction with Imran because Imran is his son.
E) Neither transaction can be a contract unless money was exchanged for the balls and outfits.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q25: A firm offer is
A) always supported by
Q26: The phrase consensus ad idem means
A) less
Q27: As Bennie entered The Big Table restaurant,
Q28: Morris posted a notice promising to pay
Q29: Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A)
Q31: Which of the following statements best explains
Q32: By submitting a tender, a party normally
A)
Q33: In late April, Harper Corp placed an
Q34: The three elements needed to create most
Q35: Regarding a battle of the forms, which
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents