Kendra suffered a broken back as a result of Duncan's carelessness. Duncan has argued, however, that Kendra's injury is remote from his carelessness, and that he therefore cannot be held liable. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) If Kendra was unusually vulnerable to a back injury, Duncan cannot be held liable unless the severity of Kendra's injury was reasonably foreseeable.
B) Duncan cannot be held liable unless Kendra's injury was likely to occur as a result of his carelessness.
C) Duncan cannot be held liable unless the manner in which Kendra suffered her injury was reasonably foreseeable.
D) Duncan cannot be held liable unless the type of injury that Kendra suffered was reasonably foreseeable.
E) Duncan will be held liable only if Kendra's injury was a direct result of his carelessness.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: You work as a risk management advisor
Q6: Which of the following statements most accurately
Q7: The Iota Corp sued Araceli for negligence.
Q8: Nelson has sued Shaniqua under the tort
Q9: The concept of reasonable foreseeability is directly
Q11: Which of the following is generally a
Q12: Peter has sued Calista and Lailani for
Q13: Jennet recently sued Lamda Corp for failing
Q14: Demarcus sued Marguerite for negligence. She has
Q15: The Town of Sussex Corner owned a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents