Brandon intended to start a new company. He issued a public statement regarding the proposed business venture. That document contained a false statement to the effect that Brandon had received government authorization to use nuclear power for his venture. In fact, authorization had not yet been granted and, indeed, was eventually refused. After reading Brandon's public statement, Abigail invested in the company. She later lost her investment when the company folded. She then sued Brandon for the tort of deceit. Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) Brandon may be held liable even if he did not intend to deceive Abigail, as long as he did in fact deceive her.
B) The tort of deceit usually causes a court to award an injunction.
C) Brandon may be held liable even if he honestly believed that he had received government authorization to use nuclear power.
D) Even if Brandon is held liable, Abigail will not necessarily receive damages representing the value that her investment would have had if Brandon's statement had been correct.
E) Brandon may be held liable if a reasonable person would have relied upon his statement, even if Abigail did not do so when she made her investment.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Emily was involved in a business dispute
Q6: Sweety Cola and Bubbly Cola are competitors
Q7: Dylan committed the tort of deceit against
Q8: Generally speaking, there are three sets of
Q9: Dakota sued Mariah for the tort of
Q11: Cornelius recklessly stored a large box of
Q12: Which of the following is the name
Q13: Brad made a false and unflattering statement
Q14: Winona has sued Ramon for the tort
Q15: The rules that apply under occupiers' liability
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents