Suki used her property in a way that interfered with the ability of her neighbour, Dick, to enjoy his property. If that interference is sufficiently severe, Suki may be held liable even if her actions were not unreasonable.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In tort law, for Suki to be held liable for nuisance, her actions must be deemed unreasonable and cause substantial interference with Dick's use and enjoyment of his property.

Suki Used Her Property in a Way That Interfered with the Ability