"To succeed in an action for intimidation, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant threatened to commit an unlawful act. Depending upon the circumstances, it may be sufficient if the plaintiff proves that the defendant threatened to commit a breach of contract." Explain the circumstances in which that statement is or is not true.
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q1: It is easier to prove the tort
Q2: Sarah made several statements to John.Because he
Q3: Casey published an untrue, unfounded, and unfavourable
Q7: The tort of intimidation always requires proof
Q14: A person cannot be held liable for
Q15: An action for the tort of nuisance
Q17: The tort of conspiracy always requires proof
Q18: The defence of statutory authority applies only
Q50: During recent proceedings, a Member of Parliament
Q70: Khalid was injured while trespassing on property
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents