Slobodan and Ashraf allegedly committed the tort of conspiracy against Vanessa. She is trying to decide whether or not she will sue them. She therefore wants to know what facts she would be required to prove in order to succeed in such a claim. In that respect, why is it important for her to determine whether the act that Slobodan and Ashraf conspired to commit was, in addition to potentially underlying the tort of conspiracy, unlawful in itself?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Slobodan and Ashraf allegedly committed the tort of conspiracy against Vanessa. She is trying to decide whether or not she will sue them. She therefore wants to know what facts she would be required to prove in order to succeed in such a claim. In that respect, why is it important for her to determine whether the act that Slobodan and Ashraf conspired to commit was, in addition to potentially underlying the tort of conspiracy, unlawful in itself?

Slobodan and Ashraf Allegedly Committed the Tort of Conspiracy Against